KX Riders

Maintenance & Technical => KX500 Aluminum Frame Conversion (AFC) => Topic started by: dsrtrider on March 22, 2009, 08:37:35 AM

Title: mxa's kx500af
Post by: dsrtrider on March 22, 2009, 08:37:35 AM
FYI
go to mxa's website http://www.motocrossactionmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=D3EF6C85FEAC47F2BC624C68E3D70AAF

they have some photos of the kx500af they have been testing past few months and winning local races.  bike looks good
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Good on March 22, 2009, 03:40:44 PM
Ug.  (drool, drool)  I'm looking forward to the writeup. :-D
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: stock500 on March 24, 2009, 09:46:40 AM
I get a little hugified over that bike.
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on March 27, 2009, 10:24:51 AM
The MXA wrecking crue are great to work with..
i'm looking foward to the article as well..
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on April 02, 2009, 08:25:59 AM
As a fellow up,
the test /review , is in the MAY issue of MXA

not out everywhere yet,
but certainly a few people have copies already..

Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on April 16, 2009, 09:42:20 AM
On the MAY  MXA cover:
Greatest 2 stroke ever!


Inside, they gave it a very nice review!!

 :-)
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: DoldGuy on April 16, 2009, 09:59:16 AM
Have not seen a May issue at the store yet. Will stop by Barnes & Noble this evening to see if they have it. Breifly read the 2 stroke vs 4 stroke article in Transworld this month. Jason Lawrence was 2 seconds (average) a lap faster on the 2 stroke than the 4 stroke and 4 seconds a lap faster on his fastest time, all on a very short course. :-D Good read also on the parts cost of maintaining the bikes.

Oh Yeah AJ

Congrats on the Article and Cover!! :-o
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on April 17, 2009, 08:48:49 AM
well th ebikes not on the cover ,, just the headline :)

but thanks!
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Good on April 17, 2009, 11:05:12 AM
I read it in Wal-Mart yesterday.  Very nice writeup.  They state that the KX pretty much owns the CR  :-D but we new that right? 8-)

Anyway, unfortunately, they went on to say the 4 srtoke trumps the 500 though, but I found it unclear as to why...

They did change some things on the bike to adjust suspension and geometry to make it handle better, but said it was normal stemming from the stock KXF250s parts.  Gonna add these aftermarket parts in the future AJ? :evil:

All in all it was great publicity for AJ and the mighty K5, and other than that silly 4 poke comment, it was a good article.
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Mick on April 19, 2009, 11:35:55 AM
It was a good honest ride report.  They favored the thumper because it's easier to ride...means faster around a track.  The bike clearly needs some suspension work, but that's all a very small price to pay for the total package.

Be sure to tell MXA how much you enjoyed the article!
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Dutch-K5 Fan on May 08, 2009, 09:24:30 AM
I've read it twice now and LOVE IT!!!!!
Yeah they say there are some miner things but thats mxa!!!
They always change tripple clamps or rear link system AND suspension settings, springs on KXF. Making it a Pro-Circuit race bike. Well there are just some Kawasaki trade offs. And I always thought that MXA was a cr500 fan, not K-5!!
Atleast they have the balls to test the bike and to etmit they LOVE IT!!!! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

"Who killed the 500 class" is a good story to read, not that it happend!!!

                 CHEERS to YOU AJ


Dutchie



Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: doordie on May 10, 2009, 04:34:39 AM
Here can you read it for free,but only 5 pages so pic them carefully before open! :wink:
http://www.zinio.com/browse/issues/index.jsp?skuId=400941248

Page 62-and further
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: augerman on May 10, 2009, 05:10:56 PM
Thanks for the link doordie :-). I found I could just print the pages to pdf without zooming & got all the pages I wanted.

Rene
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on May 15, 2009, 03:43:49 PM
You guys may find this interesting :)


http://www.motocrossactionmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=7D2DDDC09B9C4242AE1383EADB8F4B0E
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Mick on May 15, 2009, 04:15:52 PM
Go Chuck Go  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Mick on May 22, 2009, 10:43:41 AM
Any ideas why the original 250F motor mounts aren't completely machined away :?  Causes a bit of an eye sore with the old beads protruding from the frame like a teenage boy with acne.
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Emerica5 on June 01, 2009, 05:52:53 AM
Thing looks crazy, id probably have a hard time riding it
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: BullKaw on June 01, 2009, 11:26:50 AM
Any ideas why the original 250F motor mounts aren't completely machined away :?  Causes a bit of an eye sore with the old beads protruding from the frame like a teenage boy with acne.

Better yet, why use any of the 450F or 250f cradle?  :?
Why not roll your own?
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: Dutch-K5 Fan on June 02, 2009, 06:04:41 AM
Well believe me, make new cradles isn't a easy thing to do!!!
And about not removing the motormounts. Its for strenght!! Alu gets weaker when you weld it!! So grinding the
motor mount weakens a weak spot. Thats why the mounts are bigger than on a steel frame.


Dutchie
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on June 11, 2009, 11:35:10 AM
The mounts are not *completely* removed because they double in the original frame,and the modifdied one,  as skid plate mounts.
So to cut them off,  and then  reweld new ones doesnt make  a lot of since in the big picture. Same with entirely making a new cradle,
 when it isn't needed.
i do so on certain years of the Honda 500AF models, others years no.
It depends on the particular frame and particular need.

it is a production bike - not a one off.
costs /strenght and many factors are involved in each detail or decision.And a big effort is made to keep these bikes in a somewhat reasonable price point.
 The cost of the bike is mostly generated by the cost of a brand new KX500 engine.
The engine alone is 6K to 7k, depending on your partcular OEM pricing on the KX500 parts.






Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: AJ on June 11, 2009, 11:36:32 AM
The MXA article is posted on thier website now.
:)


http://www.motocrossactionmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=27FD58A4E2F04B748A11F412FD9CB148
Title: Re: mxa's kx500af
Post by: stewart on June 11, 2009, 12:24:02 PM
nice right up