KX Riders
Maintenance & Technical => KX500 Original => Topic started by: martinfan30 on March 11, 2009, 12:13:09 AM
-
What are you guys using to torque the head bolts(jug to case)? Looks like a tight fit for any sockets I have...
-
This won't be any help but I use a regular box end wrench and torque them by feel. There are crowsfoot wrenches available that fit onto atorque wrench. Cam.
-
This won't be any help but I use a regular box end wrench and torque them by feel. There are crowsfoot wrenches available that fit onto atorque wrench. Cam.
I didn't even think of crows foot wrenches...
I've been a mechanic my whole life and have a pretty good feel for torque without a wrench myself. Just want this thing to come out perfect. Not anything against your method, as I've used that in the past myself with no problems.
Whats the general consensus on this? Does everybody use a torque wrench on the head, or just by feel?
-
I also used the " By Feel " method but we've been racing for about 10 years and I think I can replace a topend in my sleep in fact I'm pretty sure I've dreamt about it way more than once . It's also a good idea to lap the head in every so often , harley make a nice head lapping tool you just put a little valve lapping compound on it and rub away, but in a pinch a sheet of sand paper on a piece of glass wetted down will work just fine, takes the little tweaks out of the head.
-
I use crows feet but it has an impact on the torque value. At least it's close and their all the same.
-
The lapping in idea is a good one. Just as I was scraping the gasket off with a razor blade, I noticed high spots around each head bolt hole....
Using crows feet will reduce the torque, just like using an extension, so i always add a few ft. pounds to the mix to compensate.
-
The lapping in idea is a good one. Just as I was scraping the gasket off with a razor blade, I noticed high spots around each head bolt hole....
Using crows feet will reduce the torque, just like using an extension, so i always add a few ft. pounds to the mix to compensate.
Laping is a must but it has to be done correctly. As for the crows foot thing I'm not so sure, if the crows foot has an offset of one inch then it's going to add one inch to the length of your wrench if it stuck strait out the front. It would add one inch pound to every foot pound you torqued the bolt too do to the added length. Now if you 180 the crows foot it would subtract one inch pound per foot pound. Now maybe if it was 90 degrees to the wrench head the torque would be correct because you wouldn't be adding or subtracting any length to the wrench. Now you have to figure out how much torque you are losing to jaw spread if you are using an open end style crows foot. If you are using a boxed end style crows foot the torque loss would be a lot less do to the fact you have no jaw spread. Now if you are using an extension it's going to flex and subtract torque, so maybe if you had the crows foot sticking strait out the front and using an extension,the flex of the extension would make up for the added length of of the crows foot and you would wind up back at the proper torque value. I don't think you would though do to the fact that there are still more variables to consider. For example: Are You torqueing your base nuts on wet or dry???
-
The lapping in idea is a good one. Just as I was scraping the gasket off with a razor blade, I noticed high spots around each head bolt hole....
Using crows feet will reduce the torque, just like using an extension, so i always add a few ft. pounds to the mix to compensate.
Laping is a must but it has to be done correctly. As for the crows foot thing I'm not so sure, if the crows foot has an offset of one inch then it's going to add one inch to the length of your wrench if it stuck strait out the front. It would add one inch pound to every foot pound you torqued the bolt too do to the added length. Now if you 180 the crows foot it would subtract one inch pound per foot pound. Now maybe if it was 90 degrees to the wrench head the torque would be correct because you wouldn't be adding or subtracting any length to the wrench. Now you have to figure out how much torque you are losing to jaw spread if you are using an open end style crows foot. If you are using a boxed end style crows foot the torque loss would be a lot less do to the fact you have no jaw spread. Now if you are using an extension it's going to flex and subtract torque, so maybe if you had the crows foot sticking strait out the front and using an extension,the flex of the extension would make up for the added length of of the crows foot and you would wind up back at the proper torque value. I don't think you would though do to the fact that there are still more variables to consider. For example: Are You torqueing your base nuts on wet or dry???
HUH? Lol. No that all makes sense. I have always torqued head bolts/nuts wet. Thats a whole 'nother story.
Cause if you use engine oil, it will torque smoothly, but might give you a few extra foot pounds of unneeded torque. Combine that with a 180 open end crows foot... You are gonna have to subtract a couple inch pounds because of the 180, then add a few foot pounds because of the wet fastener. If you use WD40 with an open ended crows foot, and a six inch 3/8" drive extension, and a 3/8" to 1/2" adaptor.. .Well thats another issue.
J/K.. Geting tired...
-
I used to be a calibration tech in the Navy.
Applying an extension to the load end (handle) will not change the moment on the arm so torque values will not change.
Applying an extension to the drive end will change (increase) the moment on the arm and will apply more torque than the setting indicates.
"A" distance = center point of drive end to the center point of load applied at the handle.
"B" distance = from center point of torque wrench drive end to the center point of the extension drive end.
"D" = desired torque at the end of the extension.
"S" = unknown torque setting using an extension.
Lets make "A" = 24 inches (torque wrench), "B" = 10 inches (extension) and we're looking for "D" = 300lbft and need to find "S" unknown (actual torque wrench setting with extension to achieve 300lbft).
S = D x A/A +B
S = 300 x 24 / 24 + 10
S = 300 x .70588
Answer: S = 211
Set your torque wrench to 211 lbft to achieve 300 lbft of torque with a 10 inch extension at the drive end of the torque wrench.
For your added enjoyment most click torque wrenches run +/- 4 % of indicated value. If set for 100 lbft your accuracy will be between 104 and 96 lbft, 50 lbft will be 52 to 48 and so on. If I remember right we were also taught that to get the +/- 4% indicated accuracy you had to be in the upper 75% of the torque wrenches range. An example would be a 0 - 100 lbft wrench. Your settings would have to be above 25 lbft for the torque wrench to be accurate.
-
This is what I use. It also work great on the sprocket nuts.
http://motionpro.com/motorcycle/partno/08-0134/ (http://motionpro.com/motorcycle/partno/08-0134/)
-
Wow,
Sounds like I may be closer "by hand". I thought torquing them wet was when I have a beer in the other hand. But seriously, adding a lubricant causes a +10% increase in the torque acheived. I threadlock my base studs with blue (which is also a semi-lube - I am told +5%). Cam.
-
Please forgive the n00b question... but what it is a "crows foot" as you all are reffering to here in this context?
And some definition to what the term "lapping" refers too?
From the context clues of the sentence it was used in... it sounds like some method/procedure for making sure the head-to-cylinder surface junctures are as planar/flat as possible so that the gasket seals proper... am I understanding it right?
-
Wow,
Sounds like I may be closer "by hand". I thought torquing them wet was when I have a beer in the other hand. But seriously, adding a lubricant causes a +10% increase in the torque acheived. I threadlock my base studs with blue (which is also a semi-lube - I am told +5%). Cam.
This brings up another question... Do you retorque the nuts after a certain amount of time with cometic gaskets?
-
G,
Here's a link to "crows foot"
http://buy1.snapon.com/catalog/tools.asp?tool=all&Group_ID=272&store=snapon-store
Don't be put off by the "Snap-On" price.. Craftsman,SK,Proto, Mac etc will be much cheaper.
The link in the above post by Martin for the motion pro tool will fit the bill also.
http://motionpro.com/motorcycle/partno/08-0134/
Thanks for taking the time to post info on the Torque stuff Pegger.
Tuck\o/
-
Call me a crude dude if you must, but I also am torquing by feel method. I think I may have put more fuel through my bike than most guys ever will, and absolutely no problems have ever occurred. I prefer a little lube on the threads to obtain a more even feel. I have been reringing about every 250 gallons and all is well, the base always stays sealed and tight, I also only use OEM gaskets.
John
-
The lapping in idea is a good one. Just as I was scraping the gasket off with a razor blade, I noticed high spots around each head bolt hole....
Using crows feet will reduce the torque, just like using an extension, so i always add a few ft. pounds to the mix to compensate.
Laping is a must but it has to be done correctly. As for the crows foot thing I'm not so sure, if the crows foot has an offset of one inch then it's going to add one inch to the length of your wrench if it stuck strait out the front. It would add one inch pound to every foot pound you torqued the bolt too do to the added length. Now if you 180 the crows foot it would subtract one inch pound per foot pound. Now maybe if it was 90 degrees to the wrench head the torque would be correct because you wouldn't be adding or subtracting any length to the wrench. Now you have to figure out how much torque you are losing to jaw spread if you are using an open end style crows foot. If you are using a boxed end style crows foot the torque loss would be a lot less do to the fact you have no jaw spread. Now if you are using an extension it's going to flex and subtract torque, so maybe if you had the crows foot sticking strait out the front and using an extension,the flex of the extension would make up for the added length of of the crows foot and you would wind up back at the proper torque value. I don't think you would though do to the fact that there are still more variables to consider. For example: Are You torqueing your base nuts on wet or dry???
I was trying to be funny with my post but I do think it is a good topic. Properly torquing things is very important. I do think things can be properly torqued by hand. I have known a few people in my time that think tighter is better and have no concept of what is tight enough. You can cost yourself more money and heart ache by over tightening things. I think it becomes more important to use a tool for torquing the smaller the torque figure. For example if you are torquing a cam cap on a thumper to 7.2 foot pounds you should use a good tool, that's why I own a digital snap-on 3/8" torque wrench but my 1/2" drive is a craftsman old school clicker. I just don't need the accuracy when I tighten the lug nuts on my truck. Some people have a good sense of what torqued right feels like and some people don't. I think that's what it really comes down to when you ask if you should use a torque wrench on your base nuts. I torqued my base nuts and even head nuts by feel (when I was young and tool impaired) for years without ever having a problem but I have a sickness called perfectionism and I also have the means to torque with a digital wrench so I do. I do not think it's a must for everyone.
-
In most cases getting the fastener tight enough is not the issue. It is stripping the nut or the hole that is the problem. I wish I had a neckle for every hole that I had to weld of helicoil for someone over the years. Oh wait...I got $20.00- $50.00 for those jobs! :-D
-
And some definition to what the term "lapping" refers too?
From the context clues of the sentence it was used in... it sounds like some method/procedure for making sure the head-to-cylinder surface junctures are as planar/flat as possible so that the gasket seals proper... am I understanding it right?
The goal is to provide the best suface for a good reliable seal. That usually means a flat surface. There is a difference between "sufacing" the gasket area and "lapping". Surfacing can be accomplished by cutting or using an abrasive attached to a stationary flat surface and moving the head or cylinder around on that surface to remove any high spots in the aluminum gasket surface. You can do this to the head, top of the cylinder, base gasket area (although it's a bit harder), carb bowl, flywheel cover, side cover, KIPS cover, case halves, etc. You get the idea. I have a surface plate that gets a lot of use. Some people use glass, although the tolerances for flatness of glass depend on a lot of factors.
Lapping is actually rubbing two mating parts together with a small amount of abrasive paste (grease with abrasive particles) to make the two surfaces match. They may not be flat. This is useful for things like conditioning the flywheel to crankshaft tapers so that they fit precisely.
As far as your cylinder and head goes, once you measure the bore, you can measure to make sure the head/gasket surface is perpendicular to the bore, the top and bottom decks are parallel, then surface the top of the cylinder and bottom of the head. If you want to go the extra step and lap the two together, well, that's up to you.
Once the cylinder studs have been installed and head nuts torqued, as stated above, the material does get deformed a bit around the threads.
Regarding torque, don't forget, specs are given based on dry (friction) threads. I use Anti-sieze in a lot of locations, so I have to be careful not to overtorque if I am using the specs.
-
Lapping a head to a cylinder can be extremely effective. I did my watercooled 2t 2-cyl roadrace bike, lapped each cyl to the milled head. I was skeptical but it ran with NO headgasket and only some kawibond as a sealer. It never did leak. The silly bike had over .100" squish clearance stock. Cam.
BDI whats the range on that snap-on. I've been thinking about getting one.
-
I had no idea that there was so many things to consider in torqueing nuts and bolts. Mainly because I don't torque too many. I do by feel with a wrench with dry threads and studs. I don't have one little spec of anti-seize, unless you call the grease in the axels and bearrings anti-seize. My 500 tends to lose bolts that are not tight enough, so I would think that anti-sieze would add to the bolt replacements. I don't lose head or base nuts or anything, but I think its important to re-torque, or in my case re-tighten after a few heat cycles to be sure it all good and the expansion/contraction has already done its thing.
BDI, do you do any bolt or nut prep to clean the threads and overall appearance of the nuts and bolts. It always is a bum deal to have a brand new part bolted on with grimy bolts. They stand out big time on clean parts.
-
Hillclimber,
A stainless steel wire brush does wonders for cleaning bolts. I did some oxidized aluminum tripples clamps and it worked very well there with a minimum of work. Cam.
-
I'm a big fan of buying new hardware. little things can mean the difference between a bike that looks new, or a polisihed turd. There are companies that offer factory correct hardware for a fair price. Nothing says squid like hardware from the hardware store on your bike. If I can clean it I do, If I can't I replace it and if it's not factory correct it is going to something exottic like titainium or anodized billet. You have to be carefull with the anodized aluminum hardeware most of the stuff sold is not good enough to hold bubble gum to your headboard.
-
Lapping a head to a cylinder can be extremely effective. I did my watercooled 2t 2-cyl roadrace bike, lapped each cyl to the milled head. I was skeptical but it ran with NO headgasket and only some kawibond as a sealer. It never did leak. The silly bike had over .100" squish clearance stock. Cam.
BDI whats the range on that snap-on. I've been thinking about getting one.
5 to 100 ft lbs, 59 to 1200 in lbs, 6.8 nm 135.6 nm. My buddy got the craftsman wrench that looks just like it but after playing with my wrench and his wrench back to back. The snap on smokes the craftsman wrench, it has a wider range and a better feal. My snap on digital is one of my favorite tools and one of my best tool investments.
-
Look in your local directory (yellow pages?) for plating. You can have all of your fasteners replated, and they look better than new. I get bright zinc, which is not quite as corrosion resistant and the original Cadmium, but works great for me. Min charge at the plater is $40 which is good for up to about 250 lbs. They have small enough basket mesh so they don't lose even the smallest washers and screws.
Looks like this before:
(http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo1/barryadam_photos/DR100partsbeforeplating.jpg)
Like this after:
(http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo1/barryadam_photos/cylinderstuds.jpg)
(http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo1/barryadam_photos/footpegs1.jpg)
(http://i356.photobucket.com/albums/oo1/barryadam_photos/DSCN4751.jpg)