KX Riders

Maintenance & Technical => KX500 Original => Topic started by: stewart on April 14, 2008, 04:10:23 PM

Title: q 16
Post by: stewart on April 14, 2008, 04:10:23 PM
q 16 fuel by vp racing fuel hauls butt.....but needs a richer jetting ,,just about flipped my bike over bakwards tonight in 4 th gear with q16 ..wow
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: Good on April 15, 2008, 02:25:31 AM
Is that with 15:1 compression?  The only stuff locally I've found is at the KTM dealer and the guy calls it 114 and doesn't even know what brand it is.  He buys it in 55 gallon drums.  I'll keep looking, hopefully for that q16 then.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on April 15, 2008, 03:07:41 AM
Is that with 15:1 compression?  The only stuff locally I've found is at the KTM dealer and the guy calls it 114 and doesn't even know what brand it is.  He buys it in 55 gallon drums.  I'll keep looking, hopefully for that q16 then.
yes 15 to 1,,,,you will only find the q 16 at vp
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on April 15, 2008, 06:24:40 AM
stewart will you still see big gains with a compression of 12:1 or 13:1? with out CCing every thing im thinking thats about where my compression is. with 10% oxygen content its got to be like a small turbo.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on April 15, 2008, 06:27:35 AM
i would us vps ...u2 fuel...
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on April 15, 2008, 06:58:15 AM
my bike don't like u2 it pings under full load (i really need to cc this girl and find out where im at, i was getting 220lbs with my snap on gage and i just had the head cut again). and i don't think VP offers u2 any more. i think it was replace by u4.2. i might give u4.2 a chance it looks to have a little more motor octane. i have had good luck with c12 but like the extra power you get with oxygenated fuel.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: flyin9 on April 15, 2008, 07:19:09 AM
i run U2E in my kart with a KX500 and it runs great for me. i just picked up some U2 because there was no more U2E left. i hope i works well.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on April 16, 2008, 02:43:49 PM
the new Q16 in stewarts bike made a BIG  diff. and it was running lean . the low end torq. was hard on the launch . with the new maxxis tire it wanted to hook and stand straight up . the other bikes ( running on trake tech 114 )would get the jump sometimes  but the second you got it under you  and was wide open it would run the other 2 bikes down and leave them by 20 yards . we were running about 90 yards before sliding another 60 yards.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on April 16, 2008, 02:48:20 PM
stewart mixed u2 and track tech 114 (50/50) it worked good on the 2000 and 2003
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on April 17, 2008, 02:00:31 PM
NAMEING STEWARTS 3 BIKES . / 2003 MEAN / 2000 NASTY / 2001 GET THE HELL OFF ME NOW! :evil: :evil: :|
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on April 21, 2008, 01:56:32 PM
had to go  from  178 mian to  185 mian with q 16   that worked great
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: don46 on April 21, 2008, 02:20:53 PM
So have you tried the q16 in the bike with the Lectron?
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on April 21, 2008, 04:39:42 PM
didn't put the lectron on yet but soon . stewart wanted to try to get the most out of it with the pwk . runs gr8t . low end is so controlable MID AND TOP WOOOW. easyer to launch and hill climb. i took off one last time as we were leaving our test grounds and took off in 2nd and was in fifth with in 40 yards with out letting off the gas at all . the Q16 and new maxxis tires are the best we have run yet . the bike is like a new bike . ribeable but meaner than before . you have to run next to someone else you have raced before to see the difference.WOW :-o :-o :-o maybe a 190 jet heee heee
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: mg82 on May 01, 2008, 11:06:40 AM
have to say that q16 does run like a raped ape with the lectron
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on May 09, 2008, 07:30:08 AM
 :-( just got 15 gallons of q16 $207 out the door. i hope it works good in my bike too.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: Hillclimb#42 on May 10, 2008, 02:13:48 AM
Whats the reccomendation for jetting increase on a k5,stock, from Premium pump gas/Cam2, to the VP U2(or equivalent)? I have a 168 in it now. Same for a 250? Any other set-up issues? I race against plenty of VP-fueled bikes, but it seems like they are all jetted funny. REAL FAT on idle jet(in the hole in neutral). They sound loaded up. Then they sound lean on top end. They even pop some when at top rpm's. Is that normal VP traits? I play ride the same bikes, so is there any issues other than jetting to think about when switching back and forth between fuels? What about a 50/50 mix of Pump gas and VP? A waste of effort and cash?
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: mg82 on May 10, 2008, 01:49:24 PM
thats not bad i paid maybe $130 for 5 gallons shipped
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: puffy on May 12, 2008, 09:13:34 AM
If you Paying that kind of money for race gas why not just run alcohol?On banshees their would be almost 20 % increase in power from race gas to alcohol.And its cheaper.Especialy if your running a hillclimber.Just my thought.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on May 12, 2008, 09:24:00 AM
If you Paying that kind of money for race gas why not just run alcohol?On banshees their would be almost 20 % increase in power from race gas to alcohol.And its cheaper.Especialy if your running a hillclimber.Just my thought.

with alcohol you have to run it out of the bike with gas or it kills internals. you have to drill out the breather on the gas tank cap. get a bigger petcock and there is no jets available you have to get a good indexed dill set and drill your own jets. you also need a lot more timing advance more than the plate on my bike will turn even with slotting it. the idea has ran through my mind but i would just put NOS on it if i need that much more.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: GDubb on May 12, 2008, 02:15:27 PM
I heard something about crystalization on the exhaust side when running oxygenated fuels. You guys heard anything about that?

-G
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: kaw rider on May 12, 2008, 03:14:48 PM
dubb
you are right on that. my 450 was bad at that. it depends on what you have for jetting and the riding style. plus it eats aluminum too. you what to run the stuff that doesn't have msbte in it.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on May 13, 2008, 12:47:17 AM
Whats the reccomendation for jetting increase on a k5,stock, from Premium pump gas/Cam2, to the VP U2(or equivalent)? I have a 168 in it now. Same for a 250? Any other set-up issues? I race against plenty of VP-fueled bikes, but it seems like they are all jetted funny. REAL FAT on idle jet(in the hole in neutral). They sound loaded up. Then they sound lean on top end. They even pop some when at top rpm's. Is that normal VP traits? I play ride the same bikes, so is there any issues other than jetting to think about when switching back and forth between fuels? What about a 50/50 mix of Pump gas and VP? A waste of effort and cash?
52 pilot ..175 mian  on u2 stock moter  at 1000 feet elavtion..70 degrees
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on May 20, 2008, 05:39:44 AM
i love Q16 awesome fuel. my bike was jetted for dumont 1,000 footish. put in the q16 @ 5,000 foot and the jetting was spot on. the bike screamed and was very crisp. and that smell, man i could go brain dead smelling that stuff.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: BDI on February 16, 2009, 02:46:44 PM
I ran Q 16 for the first time this weekend at dumont. I'm hooked like a crack head hooked on crack rock, that stuff is great.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on February 16, 2009, 03:08:34 PM
yeahhhhh . stewart hooked his Q16 barrle up to the air freshener i think glade makes it . just don't run your vent tube to your helmet .  :roll: :?
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: Mick on February 16, 2009, 03:35:16 PM
Any thoughts / experiences on VP's C10 fuel?  I know it's not their most potent stuff, but I'm looking for a milder race fuel that's lighter on the wallet.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on February 16, 2009, 05:10:06 PM
I ran Q 16 for the first time this weekend at dumont. I'm hooked like a crack head hooked on crack rock, that stuff is great.
cool
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stewart on February 16, 2009, 05:13:46 PM
Any thoughts / experiences on VP's C10 fuel?  I know it's not their most potent stuff, but I'm looking for a milder race fuel that's lighter on the wallet.
all vps prouducts have there place would think cost and compersion ratio would be the factors
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: newp500 on February 17, 2009, 03:41:34 AM
thats not bad i paid maybe $130 for 5 gallons shipped

Sweet, my wife would love to see the checkbook now :-o. I can burn 5 gallons aday on the ice, so $260 for the weekend I'll have too pass on this hp.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: k5abuser on February 17, 2009, 03:38:06 PM
newp500 just tell her that you get what you pay for and that is why you married her .  :wink:
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: stroke.n.smoke on February 18, 2009, 02:29:11 PM
Hey Mick, I am using VP c111 in mine and it works good.  Way better than pump, I have no worries anymore.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: Mick on February 19, 2009, 10:33:46 AM
I don't have a problem running pump right now, but in another year or so I'm going to have Eric Gorr do some motor work.  I'm just trying to find a good cost effective raceing fuel.  Doesn't have to be the best stuff...I'm thinking somewhere between 95-105 MON.  I'll check out that C111 stuff.
Thanks, Mick
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: bigbellybob on February 19, 2009, 10:45:46 AM
I don't have a problem running pump right now, but in another year or so I'm going to have Eric Gorr do some motor work.  I'm just trying to find a good cost effective raceing fuel.  Doesn't have to be the best stuff...I'm thinking somewhere between 95-105 MON.  I'll check out that C111 stuff.
Thanks, Mick
you could try

VP RED
A great standard grade of racing fuel. Used in higher compression race engines up to 13:1, for any application where cost is a factor.
Color: Red
Motor Octane 105
Specific Gravity: .730-.745 @ 60? F

or

VP-110
Not your "standard" 110! Highest rated MON of any 110 fuel on the market. Formulated for use in naturally aspirated engines with CRs up to approximately 12:1-13:1. Works well in 2-strokes. Good lower cost alternative.
Color: Purple
Motor Octane 107
Research Octane: 113
R+M/2: 110
Specific Gravity: .720-.735 @ 60? F

i have never ran vp-red but i did run the 110 in my 250 and it worked good.
Title: Re: q 16
Post by: Good on February 20, 2009, 03:47:19 AM
My problem is finding the stuff.  I've been to all the dealers here in town and no-one carries it.  I went to both dealers in Globe, AZ (76 miles away) and they don't carry it and can't get it.  Next stop is Tucson (120 miles give or take) but things aren't looking good.

Here locally I can get Torco 110 though... :oops: